This is taken from Yueh Phing’s blog, as part of our groups debate:
My class recently had a debate in censorship and that made me wonder whether is censorship is justified. I googled the word censorship and got these information. “Censorship is the removal and withholding of information from the public by a controlling group or body. Typically censorship is done by governments, religious groups, or the mass media, although other forms of censorship exist. The withholding of official secrets, commercial secrets, intellectual property, and privileged lawyer-client communication is not usually described as censorship when it remains within reasonable bounds. Because of this, the term "censorship" often carries with it a sense of untoward, inappropriate or repressive secrecy. Censorship is closely related to the concepts of freedom of speech and freedom of expression. When overused, it is often associated with human rights abuse, dictatorship, and repression.”
I cannot imagine a world without censorship. “In many countries there will be multiple liability for production of slanderous material, material which incites racial hatred. Where the author or publisher can not be traced or are insolvent the printers can be sued or prosecuted in some circumstances. The relatively small number of internet service providers (ISPs) should be made liable if they assist in the provision of dangerous and harmful information such as bomb making instructions, hard core pornography.”
Young children will be watching pornography without control. 8% of criminals rate pornography as their highest sexual interest. Psychologist, Edward Donnerstein from the University of Wisconsin found that brief exposure to violent forms of pornography can lead to anti-social attitudes and behaviour. This shows how dangerous pornography can be. Without censorship, I cannot imagine what will happen to the world. “In 8 of January of 2007, Brazilian authorities tried to censor the site Youtube.com due to a video of scenes of sex between the model Daniela Cicarelli and her boyfriend Renato Malzoni, filmed by a paparazzo on a beach in Spain. Companies responsible for the access to the Internet in Brazil, such as Brasil Telecom and Telefonica, initially accepted the judicial order readily, and hindered access to the site with the offending videos. Due to the great displeasure regarding the decision in the community, authorities rescinded their order the following day, and Youtube.com was once again widely available to computer users in Brazil.”
“During the Spanish-American War of 1898, reporters, if anything, led cheers for the military. Throughout World War I, journalists considered themselves part of the war effort, not independent observers. This pattern of press and military cooperation continued through World War II. But starting with the Korean War and then Vietnam, the press took an increasingly independent and critical view of the military. In Vietnam, more than 2,000 accredited reporters roamed freely throughout battle zones interviewing ordinary soldiers rather than relying on the often rosy picture of the war presented by the Pentagon. There were few incidents of news stories endangering U.S. troops or military operations. But negative press accounts fueled anti-war feelings back home. When the war in Southeast Asia finally ended, many in the military blamed the press for "losing Vietnam." Some Pentagon officials resolved to restrict press coverage of future American wars. In 1983, the Pentagon barred all journalists from the initial invasion of Grenada. Then in 1989, the Pentagon selected a dozen reporters to cover the invasion of Panama and restricted them to an airport in Panama until nearly all fighting ended.” Negative reports will make the situation worse like in the case of the Vietnam War.
“The issues at stake in this debate, protection of children, terrorist activity, crime, racial hatred are all international problems. If a global solution is required then it can be achieved by international co-operation and treaties. It is acknowledged that it is justifiable to censor where harm is caused to others by the speech, words or art of an author, all the examples cited above are clearly causing harm to various groups in society. By a combination of the initiatives listed above it is possible to limit that harm.”
Activists might fight for freedom of speech, but freedom without control will make the world a worse place to be in.
Wednesday, May 23, 2007
Thursday, May 17, 2007
The problem with the modern media is they do not have a sense of social justice.
Nowadays, with the media being so open, people are now more exposed to it then before. However, despite the growing need to be more socially responsible so as to maximise to the uses of the media, people are getting more irresponsible.
Take for example, the Prophet Mohammad incident; the Danish caused much controversy and unrest in the Islamic region. All because of a single act. An irresponsible act by a person. This caused a backlash and endangered many people’s life that is trapped on the wrong borders. The media has grown to be an overlord of information, not the protector of good quality information. Even, wrong and misleading articles like the drawing could be posted. This goes to show that the media has decayed to a level where it even endorsed such stuff as relevant news.
Another thing is, the media is only keen on promoting their own interest, whatever juicy attention seeking news they have they would publish out. They no longer have the sense of social justice to filter out the unacceptable bits. They are just interested in their own profits. So thus, how is anyone going to believe in a media which serves its own interest and not the community?
Lastly, my stand is that the media itself has evolved into something rather different from its past. In the past, the media was more factual in its reporting of news. Now, the media reports even made up news just to gain more recognition and money. The difference in objective is particularly large. One is to provide the most accurate and quickest information to the public while the other is driven by profit. Something which is driven by profit is not really a practiser of social justice right?
To round of this discussion, I would say that the modern media has no sense of social justice, mainly because now, it is driven by profit and not motivation to provide the best informations.
Take for example, the Prophet Mohammad incident; the Danish caused much controversy and unrest in the Islamic region. All because of a single act. An irresponsible act by a person. This caused a backlash and endangered many people’s life that is trapped on the wrong borders. The media has grown to be an overlord of information, not the protector of good quality information. Even, wrong and misleading articles like the drawing could be posted. This goes to show that the media has decayed to a level where it even endorsed such stuff as relevant news.
Another thing is, the media is only keen on promoting their own interest, whatever juicy attention seeking news they have they would publish out. They no longer have the sense of social justice to filter out the unacceptable bits. They are just interested in their own profits. So thus, how is anyone going to believe in a media which serves its own interest and not the community?
Lastly, my stand is that the media itself has evolved into something rather different from its past. In the past, the media was more factual in its reporting of news. Now, the media reports even made up news just to gain more recognition and money. The difference in objective is particularly large. One is to provide the most accurate and quickest information to the public while the other is driven by profit. Something which is driven by profit is not really a practiser of social justice right?
To round of this discussion, I would say that the modern media has no sense of social justice, mainly because now, it is driven by profit and not motivation to provide the best informations.
Wednesday, May 9, 2007
Censorship can never be justified?
Can censorship ever be justifiable? I believe it could be.
Firstly, censorship is justifiable in the act of preventing unwanted information from spilling out to the public. For example, in the Iraq War, the deaths of the soldiers fighting on the frontlines are all heavy covered up. The bodies if any are recovered and sent back to their families. No word is passed out to the public, except to the families. This is done to keep the morale of the people back in USA up. Though this may seem inhumane to a certain extent, looking it from another angle, they are doing this to keep a brave front so that the people will not see themselves as being governed by a weak government and thus lose faith in them. Faith is very important for a government as without the peoples support, they will inevitably crumble.
Secondly, censorship is used to prevent unpleasant and unethical stuffs from reaching us. Pornography, racist remarks, propaganda and vulgarities, to name a few are all unwanted. Stuff like this can be taken out from newspaper and radios before it can reach the people. That way, people can be protected by these ‘evil’
Well, though now everyone is talking about freedom of speech and how censorship should be banned, eliminated and the whole idea of it thrown away. I have to agree that freedom of anything one wants to do is important in this modern contest. But as always, there would be people who do not have any regards for the dignity of others. As such it would still be essential to have someone to look over it and to edit it if need be to prevent backlash from public communities. This is the same as censorship.
Thus, censorship is justifiable as like it or not, it has a purpose to serve. the community.
Firstly, censorship is justifiable in the act of preventing unwanted information from spilling out to the public. For example, in the Iraq War, the deaths of the soldiers fighting on the frontlines are all heavy covered up. The bodies if any are recovered and sent back to their families. No word is passed out to the public, except to the families. This is done to keep the morale of the people back in USA up. Though this may seem inhumane to a certain extent, looking it from another angle, they are doing this to keep a brave front so that the people will not see themselves as being governed by a weak government and thus lose faith in them. Faith is very important for a government as without the peoples support, they will inevitably crumble.
Secondly, censorship is used to prevent unpleasant and unethical stuffs from reaching us. Pornography, racist remarks, propaganda and vulgarities, to name a few are all unwanted. Stuff like this can be taken out from newspaper and radios before it can reach the people. That way, people can be protected by these ‘evil’
Well, though now everyone is talking about freedom of speech and how censorship should be banned, eliminated and the whole idea of it thrown away. I have to agree that freedom of anything one wants to do is important in this modern contest. But as always, there would be people who do not have any regards for the dignity of others. As such it would still be essential to have someone to look over it and to edit it if need be to prevent backlash from public communities. This is the same as censorship.
Thus, censorship is justifiable as like it or not, it has a purpose to serve. the community.
Tuesday, May 1, 2007
Our god gives us the right to bear arms?
The recent Virginia Tech shooting massacre has caused many people to wonder: is it alright for people to will firearms? The massacre, other than the high body count, also raised an issue on national security.
It highlighted the gun control problem in the US. The control is too relaxed for such a dangerous item. There is little or no restriction on the people who are allowed to buy a gun? Even a mentally unsound person like Cho was able to purchase 2 guns which he used to kill a number of people before turning the gun on himself.
The main reason for allowing people to purchase firearms is for the act of self defense. Guns have been used to protect one from a home intruder or other troubles. Even so, guns are also used for a sinister purpose too. People abuse the right and used the guns to commit crimes. It is sad that in the society, there are not many cases of self-defense using guns but many more cases of abuse of guns for killings.
I strongly feel that the gun control should be stricter where only authorized people can buy the guns. A lesser number of guns being wielded will result in a lesser chance of bloodshed. Also, firearms should not be sold so liberally, one have to pass tests which checks a person’s mental state before he is allowed to acquire one.
Another issue is about the security in schools. A school is a place where students go to acquire knowledge. Naturally this place should be safe and free from such terror-inducing acts. We are lucky that here in Singapore, we are relatively safe as Singapore has very strict firearm laws. Mere possession of one is enough for an arrest and discharging one result in death sentence. But, in the US, students may be going to school with firearms with them, not to participate in a mindless bloodbath but to protect themselves from one. Is it not saddening that people have to arm themselves to kill just to prevent themselves from being killed? Where is the morality in humans? On the other hand, schools ought to have better security to at least safeguard the students in case of another incident like this. A number of teachers trained in situation control can help to evacuate students or even be trained to handle the gunmen.
In conclusion, the Virginia Tech shooting massacre has raised another reason for tighter firearms control and an improvement in school security.
It highlighted the gun control problem in the US. The control is too relaxed for such a dangerous item. There is little or no restriction on the people who are allowed to buy a gun? Even a mentally unsound person like Cho was able to purchase 2 guns which he used to kill a number of people before turning the gun on himself.
The main reason for allowing people to purchase firearms is for the act of self defense. Guns have been used to protect one from a home intruder or other troubles. Even so, guns are also used for a sinister purpose too. People abuse the right and used the guns to commit crimes. It is sad that in the society, there are not many cases of self-defense using guns but many more cases of abuse of guns for killings.
I strongly feel that the gun control should be stricter where only authorized people can buy the guns. A lesser number of guns being wielded will result in a lesser chance of bloodshed. Also, firearms should not be sold so liberally, one have to pass tests which checks a person’s mental state before he is allowed to acquire one.
Another issue is about the security in schools. A school is a place where students go to acquire knowledge. Naturally this place should be safe and free from such terror-inducing acts. We are lucky that here in Singapore, we are relatively safe as Singapore has very strict firearm laws. Mere possession of one is enough for an arrest and discharging one result in death sentence. But, in the US, students may be going to school with firearms with them, not to participate in a mindless bloodbath but to protect themselves from one. Is it not saddening that people have to arm themselves to kill just to prevent themselves from being killed? Where is the morality in humans? On the other hand, schools ought to have better security to at least safeguard the students in case of another incident like this. A number of teachers trained in situation control can help to evacuate students or even be trained to handle the gunmen.
In conclusion, the Virginia Tech shooting massacre has raised another reason for tighter firearms control and an improvement in school security.
Thursday, April 26, 2007
Nowadays, the mass media do not report the news; they make the news
The media is important to society as it provides information and news to the masses of people. But, in recent times, the media is suspected of making up news to sell instead of reporting the facts or not reporting anything as there is no confirmed information. After doing some research, I found out quite a few dirty side of the media.
Firstly, it is one on the Iraq war. Fox, one of the more famous media medium, inquired that the civil war in Iraq is made up by media. I think it is not right to report such stuff without basis. Just ask the 1500 Iraqis that died, as stated in the article. It is not funny to make a joke at the expense of others, especially when human lives are involved.
Another case happens in Baghdad. The media reported a story of the six Sunni's who were burned alive last Friday in Baghdad in apparent retaliation for the deadly carbombings of the day before. This information came from a person called Jamil Hussein, who is a longtime source and a police officer. However, checks showed that there is no police officer called Jamil Hussein working there. This raise questions, is Jamil a real person? Or is he some fictional character? If he is a fictional character, then who provided the information? If he does not exist, that means the media has obviously reported those made up news made under his bogus name.
The last incident is in Japan where several media firms reported themselves for fake news.
After seeing these, I felt cheated as I always view the media as a trustworthy source of information. Now, I feel that they are not reporting the facts but making up stories to boost their income.
In conclusion, the media is not totally reliable as there are made up reports floating in them. One would have to pass accurate judgment to see what is right and what is wrong.
Sources:
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/fox-media-civil-war/
http://clublefty.blogspot.com/2006/11/who-is-jamil-hussein-and-why-you-should.html
http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=1215
Firstly, it is one on the Iraq war. Fox, one of the more famous media medium, inquired that the civil war in Iraq is made up by media. I think it is not right to report such stuff without basis. Just ask the 1500 Iraqis that died, as stated in the article. It is not funny to make a joke at the expense of others, especially when human lives are involved.
Another case happens in Baghdad. The media reported a story of the six Sunni's who were burned alive last Friday in Baghdad in apparent retaliation for the deadly carbombings of the day before. This information came from a person called Jamil Hussein, who is a longtime source and a police officer. However, checks showed that there is no police officer called Jamil Hussein working there. This raise questions, is Jamil a real person? Or is he some fictional character? If he is a fictional character, then who provided the information? If he does not exist, that means the media has obviously reported those made up news made under his bogus name.
The last incident is in Japan where several media firms reported themselves for fake news.
After seeing these, I felt cheated as I always view the media as a trustworthy source of information. Now, I feel that they are not reporting the facts but making up stories to boost their income.
In conclusion, the media is not totally reliable as there are made up reports floating in them. One would have to pass accurate judgment to see what is right and what is wrong.
Sources:
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/01/fox-media-civil-war/
http://clublefty.blogspot.com/2006/11/who-is-jamil-hussein-and-why-you-should.html
http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=1215
Friday, April 13, 2007
“YouTube has no ethics; it's been created for the sole purpose of entertainment and money.” Do you agree?
I believe that Youtube has little to no ethics and it is created solely for the purpose of entertainment and money.
Youtube provides a medium for the people to have the freedom of uploading videos for others to enjoy. It is a form of way to interact with other people and spread around the joy of your personal works and to get reviews and raves from the internet community.
Youtube allows anyone to upload any videos on the site for viewing purposes. However, as a result, some people may post videos which are offensive or discriminating are broadcasted to the world. This cause much resentment and in more serious cases, anger when they view these videos. A recent example is one which showed feet being placed over the Thailand king's face. This is seen as very insulting as the feet are considered dirty and they also held high regards for their king. What may seem funny to some people may be offensive to others. People who upload these videos do not think about the consequences that it may lead to. They just foolishly upload videos which they see as funny or entertaining but do not regard other people’s feelings.
People also use Youtube to upload popular television programmes like Korean drama and animes to allow other people to watch it too. This act is breaking the law of copyrights issues, which is illegal. Now with Youtube, everyone can watch a particular programme without needing to buy the original disc. This makes life difficult for the actors will not be able to earn their income as their shows may not sell well. After they had put in so much effort into their projects they do not see it shine due to piracy and people broadcasting it on free to view websites like Youtube. They will thus not be motivated to work hard for their next project as we had just smashed their rice bowl.
Youtube also acts like an advertisement website. They would upload movie trailers and sneak previews to promote a certain film. It thus serves as a purpose for the media to promote movies. Advertisements can also be put up in Youtube to publicize the company’s products. From the movie previews and advertisements, Youtube will able to earn money from there to provide better service to the community.
In conclusion, Youtube has been created for the sole purpose of entertainment and money. It does not really care about the consequences of the videos uploaded onto the site.
Wednesday, April 4, 2007
‘The teenage years are the best years of one’s life.’
I agree with this view. I feel that teenage years are the most enjoyable years of anyone’s life. Those years are a new start of a new experience where it cannot be felt anytime else.
Firstly, the teenage years are the best years of one’s life. When people reach teenage years, they have the most freedom than the people of the other age groups. Children are too young. They are not mature enough to make the right decisions. Adults also have less freedom due to the fact they are all have responsibilities like work, family and monetary issues to bother them. Their freedom is very limited too due to the problems plaguing them. Thus, teenagers are in the most carefree times of their lives and thus should thoroughly enjoy it.
Secondly, during our teenage years, we only have to concentrate on studies and not have to worry about other responsibilities such as monetary and working opportunity. Teenagers are also pretty much sheltered from the harsh real world. One of the examples is the power struggle in a company where everyone wants to get to the top. All they will think of is means and ways to push people down and climb up the social ladder. Compare this to school, where It is still quite pure and innocent where there is little or no struggle for positions. Without these matters to plague them, teenagers of course have every opportunity to enjoy themselves.
Lastly, they are still in their comfort zone where they can do almost anything they like. When they start working, they would have to listen to their superiors even when they feel that the latter is not right and have to meet the deadline punctually. If they defied orders, they may lose their job and thus pay a heavy price. During the teenage years where teenagers are still schooling, teachers would only scold them or sent them for detention if they do not submit their homework on time. The consequences are not as big as when they start working. Thus, as a teenager, one could make mistakes and still will not be punished severely. It gives much more learning space as they do not feel as much stress and setback should they do something wrong and would likely learn from their mistakes so that they do repeat them again. Its better to learn things this way then through the hard way.
In conclusion, teenage years are the best years of one’s life. Therefore, you must treasure the time when you are a teenager, as It is a once in a life time experience and once past, never to return again
Firstly, the teenage years are the best years of one’s life. When people reach teenage years, they have the most freedom than the people of the other age groups. Children are too young. They are not mature enough to make the right decisions. Adults also have less freedom due to the fact they are all have responsibilities like work, family and monetary issues to bother them. Their freedom is very limited too due to the problems plaguing them. Thus, teenagers are in the most carefree times of their lives and thus should thoroughly enjoy it.
Secondly, during our teenage years, we only have to concentrate on studies and not have to worry about other responsibilities such as monetary and working opportunity. Teenagers are also pretty much sheltered from the harsh real world. One of the examples is the power struggle in a company where everyone wants to get to the top. All they will think of is means and ways to push people down and climb up the social ladder. Compare this to school, where It is still quite pure and innocent where there is little or no struggle for positions. Without these matters to plague them, teenagers of course have every opportunity to enjoy themselves.
Lastly, they are still in their comfort zone where they can do almost anything they like. When they start working, they would have to listen to their superiors even when they feel that the latter is not right and have to meet the deadline punctually. If they defied orders, they may lose their job and thus pay a heavy price. During the teenage years where teenagers are still schooling, teachers would only scold them or sent them for detention if they do not submit their homework on time. The consequences are not as big as when they start working. Thus, as a teenager, one could make mistakes and still will not be punished severely. It gives much more learning space as they do not feel as much stress and setback should they do something wrong and would likely learn from their mistakes so that they do repeat them again. Its better to learn things this way then through the hard way.
In conclusion, teenage years are the best years of one’s life. Therefore, you must treasure the time when you are a teenager, as It is a once in a life time experience and once past, never to return again
Sunday, March 25, 2007
Me...The Reckoning
My name is Nicholas Cheng. My name symbolises victory and I think it is very befiting as i cannot bear to be 2nd place.
I was from Catholic High. Best school there is in my opinion. Now it feels very strange to wear long pants to school. Short pants AKA burmudas are the most comfortable. I miss them, but this is all part of changing and growing up and taking new things as they come.
I was from NPCC. I am a holder of the SPF badge which is only given to the top 1% of Singapore cohort or roughly 90 students for outstanding contributions. I was a squad leader and thoroughly enjoyed my time with my squad. I am going back as a Cadet Inspector to maintain my unit's proficiency. I am proud to say I am a Catholic High school NPCC member.
People call me big friendly giant because I am friendly and also because I am tall too.184cm I think the machine got problem, I shrunk by 1 cm). I like gaming and used to play a MMORPG World of Warcraft. Its highly addictive and fun but i have quited as it takes up alot of time and I feel that there is more to life than gaming.
My target for JC is to get the neccessary results to qualify for engineering course in university and also to excel in activities outside of school work.
My motto: Only the toughest people will stand out, if you are weak, nobody gives a damn about you. It is a dog eat dog society and to survive, you have to work your way to the top of the food chain, do this or get thrown out of the race.
Me? I want to be at the top, where I believe I belong.
I was from Catholic High. Best school there is in my opinion. Now it feels very strange to wear long pants to school. Short pants AKA burmudas are the most comfortable. I miss them, but this is all part of changing and growing up and taking new things as they come.
I was from NPCC. I am a holder of the SPF badge which is only given to the top 1% of Singapore cohort or roughly 90 students for outstanding contributions. I was a squad leader and thoroughly enjoyed my time with my squad. I am going back as a Cadet Inspector to maintain my unit's proficiency. I am proud to say I am a Catholic High school NPCC member.
People call me big friendly giant because I am friendly and also because I am tall too.184cm I think the machine got problem, I shrunk by 1 cm). I like gaming and used to play a MMORPG World of Warcraft. Its highly addictive and fun but i have quited as it takes up alot of time and I feel that there is more to life than gaming.
My target for JC is to get the neccessary results to qualify for engineering course in university and also to excel in activities outside of school work.
My motto: Only the toughest people will stand out, if you are weak, nobody gives a damn about you. It is a dog eat dog society and to survive, you have to work your way to the top of the food chain, do this or get thrown out of the race.
Me? I want to be at the top, where I believe I belong.
Monday, February 26, 2007
Is professional parenting is the way to go for Singapore?
I do not think that professional parenting is the way to go for future Singapore.
Firstly, nothing in the world can replace the kind of love, care and concern the real parent can provide. Professional parenting may sound like a perfect solution to the rapidly changing world, but it is not able to take over parental love. The first thing a child recognizes when he or she is born. A child needs the real parental guidance only providable by the own parents, not just any other human. Can bring up the child exactly the way a parent would want them to be.
Secondly, the act of separating the child from his or her parents is cruel. The very act is already harsh. Which parent would want to be away from their child? I am sure no sane parent would leave their child at the hands of a “professional” to take care of. Even if they are very busy with their work and have to move about, they would hand their child to a relative. At least it will be safer that way.
Lastly, professional parenting goes against the law of nature. A parent has the right and responsibility to ensure the child receives the love and care from them. It is not something they can offload it to another. If this is the case, then why have the child at the first place?
In conclusion, professional parenting is not the way to go simply because it could not replace the most important thing of life, love.
Firstly, nothing in the world can replace the kind of love, care and concern the real parent can provide. Professional parenting may sound like a perfect solution to the rapidly changing world, but it is not able to take over parental love. The first thing a child recognizes when he or she is born. A child needs the real parental guidance only providable by the own parents, not just any other human. Can bring up the child exactly the way a parent would want them to be.
Secondly, the act of separating the child from his or her parents is cruel. The very act is already harsh. Which parent would want to be away from their child? I am sure no sane parent would leave their child at the hands of a “professional” to take care of. Even if they are very busy with their work and have to move about, they would hand their child to a relative. At least it will be safer that way.
Lastly, professional parenting goes against the law of nature. A parent has the right and responsibility to ensure the child receives the love and care from them. It is not something they can offload it to another. If this is the case, then why have the child at the first place?
In conclusion, professional parenting is not the way to go simply because it could not replace the most important thing of life, love.
Tuesday, February 20, 2007
Mercy killing, is it a viable option?
Euthanasia, otherwise known as mercy killing is used to end a life prematurely, however this is done so as to lessen the victim's sufferings.
I believe mercy killing should be authorized under strict conditions. By strict conditions, I mean under the supervision of family members and doctors in charge of the patient. Also, the patient must be certified to have no chance of a turnaround in his or her conditions.
Mercy killing can be done to lessen not only the victim’s suffering but also the family members too. It is tough for a mother to see her very own son lying in bed, day after day with medical supports hooked up all over his body, and having no hope of a recovery. It would have been better to let the victim go in peace, to die with honor, instead of succumbing in the end with tons of wires poked into the body.
Mercy killing may sound barbaric. How can we end a person’s life without his consent? He can not speak for himself, so how can we pass judgment to him and ‘sentence’ him to death? But I would ask, then how can u know he does not want the pain to end?
This topic is very taboo as it comprises of human life in it. Some of the people who have friends and relatives who are in this kind of condition have expressed their wish for euthanasia. They do not want their loved ones death prolonged. And I agreed with them as what is the use of extending a life if he got no chance to recover.
In conclusion, Mercy killing should be authorized as it saves people the hardship of watching their loved ones die slowly.
Mercy killing can be done to lessen not only the victim’s suffering but also the family members too. It is tough for a mother to see her very own son lying in bed, day after day with medical supports hooked up all over his body, and having no hope of a recovery. It would have been better to let the victim go in peace, to die with honor, instead of succumbing in the end with tons of wires poked into the body.
Mercy killing may sound barbaric. How can we end a person’s life without his consent? He can not speak for himself, so how can we pass judgment to him and ‘sentence’ him to death? But I would ask, then how can u know he does not want the pain to end?
This topic is very taboo as it comprises of human life in it. Some of the people who have friends and relatives who are in this kind of condition have expressed their wish for euthanasia. They do not want their loved ones death prolonged. And I agreed with them as what is the use of extending a life if he got no chance to recover.
In conclusion, Mercy killing should be authorized as it saves people the hardship of watching their loved ones die slowly.
Wednesday, January 31, 2007
Human organ trade, should it be allowed?
Human organs have long been used to save lives. People with liver or kidney failure have had their lives miraculously saved by a divine act of donation from someone.
Thus one have to question, if organs are so widely demanded, why not put them up on sales. Furthermore, we only need one kidney to survive, thus, the other one can be sold to help save a life.
However, I disagree on the sales or human organ. I feel that it isn’t ethical to be selling our body parts. If we really want to give, we should not take money in return. It should be given as a charitable act and not for greed.
Also, by putting organs for sales, the poor will be put in disadvantaged as the rich can just jump their queue and purchase the organs. In the past, people have to wait in line for their turn. Thus I disagree that the sales be legalized as everyone life is equally important and that people cannot jump the order just because they have money.
In conclusion, I feel that the ban on human organ trade should stay as it is morally wrong for us to be trading and selling organs like it is some kind of good. The best policy is still the waiting list format where people are put in a queue so that no one is put at disadvantaged.
Thus one have to question, if organs are so widely demanded, why not put them up on sales. Furthermore, we only need one kidney to survive, thus, the other one can be sold to help save a life.
However, I disagree on the sales or human organ. I feel that it isn’t ethical to be selling our body parts. If we really want to give, we should not take money in return. It should be given as a charitable act and not for greed.
Also, by putting organs for sales, the poor will be put in disadvantaged as the rich can just jump their queue and purchase the organs. In the past, people have to wait in line for their turn. Thus I disagree that the sales be legalized as everyone life is equally important and that people cannot jump the order just because they have money.
In conclusion, I feel that the ban on human organ trade should stay as it is morally wrong for us to be trading and selling organs like it is some kind of good. The best policy is still the waiting list format where people are put in a queue so that no one is put at disadvantaged.
Family, are they critical in society?
The word “Family”, in the dictionary, means a group of people who shares a common ancestry. In modern context however, I see family as a group of people who shares their hardship and happiness with each other and gives support at times of need.
I feel that family is important and essential in our society. Be it a normal family comprising of a father, a mother, siblings and us, or a family of our best friends, or even an organization, these families are there to help each other. Man is not made to be a soloist. Man is a team player. That is why we have evolved to be far greater than any living things that walk our Earth. It is the ability to relate to each other and find support to go on and achieve goals which have made us superior to other species.
Everyone at one point of his or her life will need motivation and support from someone. At moments of stress and difficulty, we often reach out our hands and help will most likely come from a family member. Family members are the people who will not abandon us, no matter what situation we are in. The bond in blood is strongest at times of difficulty. Thus, just imagine that we face an obstacle which we cannot possibly overcome ourselves and there is no one to help us. Isn’t it sad that the most superior beings will just crumble like any others? Humans are a very vulnerable species despite our achievements with our family always there to support us so that we can go on to do great things. However, the most important element is our foundation.
Besides moral support, the family is also important to educate the younger generation about ethics, right behavior, and ways of life. It is not something that someone on the street can teach us. Our parents are the more influential people we will meet in our life besides our gurus, teachers and schoolmates at learning, our superiors and colleagues at work, our friends in society and our spouse and children to live our next generation. Their lives and actions will leave deep impression, emotion and motivation that will surely affect and impact the ways we think and act. Many criminals are known to have come from broken home while no fewer successful people have come from poor but unbroken family. The family we have will definitely play a part in determining the way we lead our life.
Last but not the least, having a family will build our attachment towards the society. If we have a caring and loving family, chances are we will be more inclined to help the society, the community and others if not the nation. Only then can the society progresses since a society is only as strong as its weakest link.
In conclusion, the society needs family to prosper. Without it, it will lack the foundation to grow.
I feel that family is important and essential in our society. Be it a normal family comprising of a father, a mother, siblings and us, or a family of our best friends, or even an organization, these families are there to help each other. Man is not made to be a soloist. Man is a team player. That is why we have evolved to be far greater than any living things that walk our Earth. It is the ability to relate to each other and find support to go on and achieve goals which have made us superior to other species.
Everyone at one point of his or her life will need motivation and support from someone. At moments of stress and difficulty, we often reach out our hands and help will most likely come from a family member. Family members are the people who will not abandon us, no matter what situation we are in. The bond in blood is strongest at times of difficulty. Thus, just imagine that we face an obstacle which we cannot possibly overcome ourselves and there is no one to help us. Isn’t it sad that the most superior beings will just crumble like any others? Humans are a very vulnerable species despite our achievements with our family always there to support us so that we can go on to do great things. However, the most important element is our foundation.
Besides moral support, the family is also important to educate the younger generation about ethics, right behavior, and ways of life. It is not something that someone on the street can teach us. Our parents are the more influential people we will meet in our life besides our gurus, teachers and schoolmates at learning, our superiors and colleagues at work, our friends in society and our spouse and children to live our next generation. Their lives and actions will leave deep impression, emotion and motivation that will surely affect and impact the ways we think and act. Many criminals are known to have come from broken home while no fewer successful people have come from poor but unbroken family. The family we have will definitely play a part in determining the way we lead our life.
Last but not the least, having a family will build our attachment towards the society. If we have a caring and loving family, chances are we will be more inclined to help the society, the community and others if not the nation. Only then can the society progresses since a society is only as strong as its weakest link.
In conclusion, the society needs family to prosper. Without it, it will lack the foundation to grow.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)